Skip to content

RFT-SIRM Application Programmes: QPU/Sierpiński, Invariant Battery, and Cosmology Genesis

Purpose: a source-linked, evidence-bounded index of three distinct RFT-SIRM application research tracks. This page records their place in the wider programme; it does not merge their implementations into UltraCore-RFT or certify their technical, commercial, or legal status.

RFT-QPU-Sierpinski

RFT-Invariant-Battery

RFT-Cosmology-Genesis

Evidence boundary

Reading rule: the badges are navigation and status labels only. They are not certification marks, experimental results, patent-status indicators, or endorsements.

1. Where these programmes sit

UltraCore-RFT is the documentation and coordination hub. The programmes below are distinct application research tracks with their own repositories, assumptions, code, tests, and licensing terms. They are not corollaries of the fourth-moment theorem, and no mathematical or engineering result should be transferred between them without an explicit derivation and evidence.

Track Primary source Current description What is not established by the repository description
Quantum-processing architecture RFT-QPU-Sierpinski A proposed graph-based architecture using self-similar Sierpiński-gasket connectivity, SU(2)-valued edge transport, and a candidate two-dimensional logical subspace. The repository includes a minimal research simulator and a patent-oriented technical disclosure for counsel review. A fabricated or experimentally validated device; fault tolerance; measured gate fidelity; universal noise protection; demonstrated quantum advantage or speed-up; patent grant or established patentability.
Energy-system model RFT-Invariant-Battery. An invariant-driven state-transition model and reproducible vehicle/energy scenarios, with assumptions and CSV outputs described by the source repository. A physically demonstrated 10,000-km battery; new cell chemistry; validated battery-management controller; safety certification; independently demonstrated energy savings; patent grant or established patentability.
Cosmology / CMB phenomenology RFT-Cosmology-Genesis A reduced Pass-1 phenomenological model mapping the stated intensive invariant to a photon-sector coupling ansatz and computing a background/geometric CMB response. The repository includes an exact algebraic limit/remainder derivation on PR branch #1; CI has passed, while human review and merge remain pending. A physical photon-sector interaction; explanation or fit of observed CMB data; full Boltzmann treatment; Planck/ACT/SPT/BAO likelihood analysis; observational detection; a new physical law; Lean formalization of the new remainder theorem.

2. RFT-QPU-Sierpinski

The source repository proposes connecting self-similar graph geometry with non-Abelian SU(2) transport and projected logical controls. Its documentation describes a pre-experimental architecture, not a completed quantum processor.

The repository reports a minimal numerical core and lists a validation programme that includes logical-subspace isolation, leakage separation, projected-control independence, calibration sensitivity, disorder, thermal effects, readout, crosstalk, and scaling. These are validation obligations, not results that should be presumed complete.

The patent-oriented document is a technical disclosure for qualified counsel to review. It is not a legal opinion, a patent application receipt, a granted patent, or a conclusion that any claim meets novelty, inventive-step/non-obviousness, enablement, ownership, or other legal requirements.

3. RFT-Invariant-Battery

The source repository studies an invariant-gated state-transition pattern:

measure → state → invariant gate → allowed transition → execute → verify

It reports a 10,000-km vehicle/energy-system scenario under a deliberately high 1,500 Wh/kg pack-level energy-density research sweep. The README reports 2.761 MWh for a baseline scenario, 3.205 MWh for an adverse scenario, and 2.716 MWh for a bounded-controller hypothesis. These are model outputs under stated assumptions, not measured pack performance or experimental proof of the controller's benefit.

The project itself states that it has not established a physical 10,000-km battery, new cell chemistry, validated BMS controller, safety certification, or experimental benefit from invariant-driven control. This status must remain explicit in public descriptions.

4. RFT-Cosmology-Genesis

The source repository records a reproducible Pass-1 phenomenological calculation using the stated invariant

\[ I_m(\theta)=-16\frac{3^{m-1}+1}{3^{m+1}+3}\sin^2\!\left(\frac{\theta}{2}\right), \qquad q_m=1+\epsilon I_m(\theta). \]

The repository now has a proposed analytic statement for the exact limit and finite-level remainder:

\[ I_\infty(\theta)=-\frac{16}{9}\sin^2\!\left(\frac{\theta}{2}\right), \qquad I_m(\theta)-I_\infty(\theta) =-\frac{32}{9(3^m+1)}\sin^2\!\left(\frac{\theta}{2}\right). \]

The theorem document and regression tests are being reviewed in the source repository's PR #1. The source PR's CI has passed, but human review and merge remain pending. This hub treats the statement as an analytic result under review, not as a merged release or Lean-formalized theorem.

The cosmology repository itself explicitly limits its scope: the coupling is phenomenological; the acoustic calculation is reduced; baseline acoustic multipoles are reference values; and no full CMB likelihood is implemented. No observational detection, new physical law, or physical origin for \(\epsilon\) is claimed.

5. Evidence and claim boundaries

Use these labels consistently across the programme:

  • Formal theorem: a proposition proved in a specified formal system for its exact definitions and assumptions.
  • Numerically reproduced: a computational result tied to named code, inputs, parameters, tolerances, and outputs.
  • Engineering-tested: a claim supported by tests or experiments for a specified implementation and configuration.
  • Research architecture: a proposed design whose key physical or operational requirements remain to be validated.
  • Modelled scenario: an output of a model under declared assumptions; not a physical measurement.
  • Patent-oriented disclosure: technical material organized for counsel review; not a statement of patent grant, patentability, priority, or freedom to operate.

A successful test suite, an attractive banner, a numerical fit, or a patent-oriented document cannot by itself promote a claim to a stronger evidence category. Report unresolved validation items rather than silently treating them as complete.

6. Attribution, licensing, and public-disclosure discipline

The QPU and Invariant Battery source repositories publish their own LICENSE.md files describing Business 1.0 proprietary / all-rights-reserved terms. Cosmology-Genesis declares Apache-2.0. All upstream licenses remain separate from the Apache-2.0 license for original UltraCore-RFT content.

Accordingly, this hub provides source links and short factual descriptions; it does not copy source code, figures, tables, or substantial passages from those repositories. The UltraCore-RFT license must not be read as relicensing upstream project materials. Permission to reuse third-party material must be checked against the relevant source license and, where necessary, obtained in writing from the rights holder.

Public GitHub publication is not a substitute for an IP strategy. Before making further disclosures or relying on a patent position, obtain qualified advice on ownership and inventorship, prior art, filing dates and jurisdictions, claim scope, enablement, licensing, confidentiality, and any applicable disclosure deadlines. This page is a documentation record, not legal advice and not a determination that any invention is patentable or protected.

No employment, partnership, institutional sponsorship, endorsement, regulatory approval, or commercial readiness is implied by inclusion in this index.

7. Maintenance checklist

  • [ ] Keep each description synchronized with its primary repository and current evidence.
  • [ ] Confirm Cosmology-Genesis PR #1 CI and review status before changing the theorem's status label.
  • [ ] Preserve the exact repository URL for the battery project, including the final period in its repository name.
  • [ ] Keep model assumptions and experimental status beside any quoted numerical result.
  • [ ] Do not imply that the fourth-moment theorem validates either application.
  • [ ] Do not copy upstream proprietary implementation materials into UltraCore-RFT without confirming permission.
  • [ ] Update these labels only when the underlying evidence changes.

This index summarizes public repository documentation as a research-navigation aid. It is not an independent technical audit, legal opinion, patentability assessment, or investment recommendation.